Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for February, 2011

Region: Pfalz, Germany
Grapes involved: Pinot Gris
Cost: $12.99
Food pairings: Lemme think. This would be epic with some seafood, especially oilier fishes. Like salmon baked with lemon and dill. Frankly, it’s awesome on its own, which is how I’ve been going about it.

The nose is bright citrus, a hint of sweet white floral (not all the way to jasmine – maybe paperwhite), and a touch of mineral. It’s very clean. I would like a perfume of it.

This wine. OMG. It’s tangerine right on the tip of the tongue, and it has a hit of really bright acidity right at the beginning. Then it sort of fades into this taste that I can best describe as being “wet rock” – minerals! – which is the main thing I sort of look for in Pinot Gris/Grigios and which has turned into one of my favorite tastes in white wine. It’s clean, somehow, and rocky, and honestly really awesome. Really rocky-tasting mineral water would be the best comparison.

So basically: tangerines and rocks. There’s a few grassy hints and whatnot to sort of round it out, but mostly tangerines and rocks.

Me likey. A lot.

At the moment, this is my new favorite Pinot Gris. It’s FANTASTIC. It’s so packed full of flavor that it makes most of the Pinot Gris/Pinot Grigios I’ve had taste frankly watery. Like, I didn’t know this grape could do this. Eat it, Santa Margarita.

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 (yes, I was in fact motivated to put hearts here. Sorry. That’s honestly never happened before in six months of reviews. So… that should tell you something.)

Fun Note: this wine is imported (read: IMPORTED NOT MADE BY, since he apparently has vineyards of his own – I played around with research and am going on what I’ve managed to turn up. So if I’m wrong, holler and I will edit!) by a guy named Ernst Loosen, who apparently imports flipping awesome wine. So if you’re playing around in the Germany section of your local wine store, his name is apparently a good indicator of a good bottle.

Read Full Post »

So the beer I’m talking about in this post? I drew the arrow pointing to it. It’s a rich milk chocolate brown color and yes, that is my geeky self holding it. LOOKITME I’M ON TV!!!!!!

Basic Info:
Name:
Oliver Brown Ale
Origin: Free State Brewery, Lawrence, KS
Style: Brown Ale
ABV: not given per usual Free State operating procedure; OG of 1.057
IBU: 63
I drank this: at the brewery during a taping of the Rachel Maddow Show+

First of all, this really is an Oliver Brown Ale and not Free State’s usual John Brown Ale.* So don’t think I got it wrong – Free State just happens to have a legion of kickass brown ales in its repertoire.

So. The beer. This beer is a highly-hopped brown ale. This is a style that can be either very, very bad or relatively good. In this case, it was very good, which puts it a few steps beyond every other beer of this style I’ve ever had (including Free State’s own Stormwatch Ale – if you’ve had that beer, the Oliver Brown is what the Stormwatch (and every other beer of this style) is trying to be).

The scent of the beer is a rich, malty scent with hints of grassy/citrus hops and a back hint of chocolate. The beer is suitably chocolate-dark for a brown ale, and fairly opaque. The head lasted for about five minutes and was a sort of cream color.

Flavor-wise, this beer is a combination of some really rich malts with some strong chocolate hints – I’m guessing chocolate malts make up a pretty hefty percentage of the malt profile here – combined with citrus and grassy hops. The hops are strong and quite bitter, but balanced well with the strong malt profile. The thing that makes this beer a standout for me is the way the hops interact with the chocolate undertones – the beer has a sort of chocolate/orange flavor combination going on that is fantastic. It’s a subtle flavor, but it’s there, and it’s awesome.

I gather from the website that this is one of Free State’s newest beers. I’m a fan. I hope they brew it again.

____________________________________________________
*HISTORY LESSON! The John Brown Ale is named after the abolitionist John Brown, he of the famous painting wherein our namesake is crazily bearded and surrounded by smoke, piles of bodies and tornadoes. Trust me, you’ve seen it. Especially if you grew up in Kansas.
Oliver Brown, on the other hand, is the main figure in Brown v the Board of Education. If you don’t know what I’m referring to, please go join Sarah Palin in a remedial US History class.

+ RACHEL RACHEL RACHEL THANK YOU FOR COMING TO FREE STATE
Seriously, it was really flipping cool to see someone whose work I admire so strongly doing her thing at one of my all-time favorite watering holes. Thank you for remembering there are a few liberals in the Midwest, and that we like the attention.

Read Full Post »

One of my kickass coworkers gifted me a bottle of this when I mentioned that I hadn’t had a chance to try it yet.

Basic Info:
Name:
Trippel*
Origin: New Belgium Brewing Co.,  Fort Collins, CO
Style: Belgian-style Trippel
ABV: 7.8%
IBU: 25
I drank this: at home during my first listen to the new Radiohead album**

This beer begins with a rich, slightly banana-tinged honey-like scent. (Note: there is no banana anywhere near this beer. None. The banana-like hint that comes in this beer, and many other Belgian-style ales, is due to the yeast strains the brewers use. I tend to notice stronger banana hints in American-brewed Belgian style ales than I do in Belgian ales actually from Belgium, but that could just be my not-huge sample size from either category.) The coriander that they throw in is there, but barely – it does a good job of melding with the fruitiness of the yeast and malt.

This beer has a great mouthfeel – it’s thick and creamy with just a hint of bite from the hops and a hint of tingle from the carbonation. The flavor of the beer is just as complex and layered. It starts off with touches of honey and banana-hints, then a slight touch of bitterness, followed by malty sweetness and the coriander hint, and there’s the slightest hint of sour at the back of the mouth. A few sips in, that sour flavor starts to turn into the calling card of good lighter-colored Belgian beers: flowers and hay.

Reading this, I know I’m talking about everything being in “hints” and “touches” and so on, as though the beer had no real flavor. But it does – it’s absolutely *packed* with flavor. It’s just that there’s so much going on and it’s all so well-balanced that there’s no one (or two, or four) dominant flavor(s).

This beer is a major change of pace for me – longtime readers will know that I tend toward the extreme flavors, going for either super-hoppy or super-dark-malty in my beers. This is nothing if not not-extreme (triple negative, people). It’s sophisticated as hell, and absolutely lovely.

___________________________________________________
*A Trippel is actually a style of Belgian beer – “trippel” (as opposed to “dubbel” or “quadruppel,” whose English cognates are close enough that I’m not going to bother translating) refers to the amount of malt put into the initial recipe (i.e, a simple gets the normal amount of malt, a dubbel gets twice that and so on), which then affects the alcohol content and the length of time the beer ages. Simply put, the higher the number, the more malt put into the beer, the longer the beer took to make and the higher the alcohol content.
**Those of you who know me well know my insane Radiohead obsession. They are far and away my favorite band by such a margin it’s stupid. That I decided to try this beer during my first listen to the new album is a major compliment, because it says that I had faith this beer would be complex enough to be worthy of new Radiohead. I’m happy with the choice.

Read Full Post »

Because Jen promised you I’d give y’all the mussels recipe.

You will need:
- mussels – roughly the 1-2 pound mark, depending on how many you’ll be feeding and that sort of thing
- extra virgin olive oil
- 3-ish cloves garlic, finely minced
- either a teaspoon or so of dried thyme or a tablespoon plus of fresh
- 2 T tomato paste*
- red pepper flakes
- solid splash of white wine (say 3/4-1 cup)
- handful of finely chopped parsley

To make:
Soak the mussels in coldish water for about half an hour so that they disgorge any sand. Scrub the shells so that they’re nice and clean, and cut off any exposed beard (the funky looking  non-shell stuff that may be sticking out of the side).
Put a deep pot on medium heat. Throw a couple of loops around the pan’s worth of olive oil in there, and then throw the garlic in. Let the garlic begin to soften and get all fragrancehappy. Then toss in the tomato paste and stir it around, letting it start to dissolve into the olive oil/garlic mixture. When that’s gotten nice and fragrant – say roughly a minute or so – toss in the red pepper flakes (this is a to-taste type thing – I like it hot, and I’m something of a babymouth). Let those go for another minute, and then pour in the wine.

Once the wine has been added, throw in the mussels and slam a lid on everything. The mussels will be done when they’re open. Once they’ve opened, pour them (and the broth) into a large bowl. Toss any that haven’t opened – those are bad. Toss the parsley in on top and serve with lots of bread to dip in the broth.
_______________________________________________________________
*I use the tomate paste that comes in a tube. It’s pricier than the can stuff, but it has this glorious bonus: I can close the tube. Like, it has a cap. I can’t close a can when I’m done. Given I use roughly 1-2T of tomato paste per recipe most of the time, and that the tube stays well and good for a couple of years, I end up saving money by getting the tube over using cans. Plus it’s better tomato paste.

Read Full Post »

Region: Casablanca Valley, Chile
Grapes involved: Sauvignon Blanc
Cost: $13.99
Food pairings: This was bangup awesome with seafood and with the veggie tapas we were having. Jen has all the foodie details here. I understand if you hate us by the time you’re done reading it all. Specifically, you need to get your hands on the zucchini fritters and the white bean spread/baguette with this wine – so, so, so good. *drool*

That said, this is a not-great pic with an even less-great attempt at sangria in the background. So, um, I won’t share the sangria recipe with you because it was lackluster at best. This wine, however, is top notch, even if we were drinking out of mason jars.*

So in the great world of Sauvignon Blancs, I’m used to New Zealand’s more than anywhere elses. The reason for this lies in the sort of dilletante-ism that rules my life when I’m not being particularly careful or methodical about learning – i.e., I read in a magazine article at some point in college that the best Sauvignon Blancs come from New Zealand, and so I have generally ever since grabbed NZ Sauv Blanc whenever that was the sort of wine I was going for (without, you know, doing any of the research or anything necessary to tell me whether or not that one line in a magazine might actually be worth listening to). The upshot here is that due to that one randomly-grabbed tidbit of information, this was the first non-New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc I’ve had in years.

NZ Sauvignon Blancs (<—— I am getting sick of typing that, so I assume you’re sick of reading it,) are  bright and citrusy and cheerful. This was… not that. It is still a bright and cheerful wine, and it still has some decidedly citrusy characteristics, but it’s different.

The nose is predominantly grassy and herbal, with a hint of something that I swear my nose read as rosemary. And there’s something citrusy as well, but it’s lemongrass more than lemon – citrus-like, but planty rather than juicy.

The flavor is fantastic: it’s lemon rind, herbs, grass, hay, and something quite mineral-y. After a few more sips, it gets even more strongly grassy and develops a topnote of tangerine out of nowhere, which I really enjoyed.

This wine has a nice acidity and a pure, clean flavor (this is largely a combo of the citrus and the mineral: mineral always reads “clean” to me).

Overall, it’s flipping fantastic. It lacks some of the citrusy brightness of New Zealand Sauvignon Blancs, but makes up for it in the grassy, hay-like mineral area. This wine is radically different than any white I’ve had before. I’d really like to have it again, and to try some other SBs from South America. Good stuff.

______________________________________________________
*wine glasses were available – the mason jar thing was my fault. What can I say – I had just chopped off most of my hair and was feeling sorta hipster. And wine glasses are so establishment, y’all.

And finally: the mussels recipe is in the next post. Enjoy!

Read Full Post »

I would feel remiss as a blogger if I didn’t relate to you people what happened with the Boulevard Chocolate Ale. Because the situation surrounding this beer qualifies as a “what happened” rather than a “standard limited edition beer release.”

Basically, the whole of Kansas City went berserk.

For those of you not familiar with the area, Boulevard is KC’s biggest and favoritest brewery, and the chocolatier they worked with, Christopher Elbow, is a local legend for making Beyond the Impossible-level awesome chocolate.* People were excited, with good reason. It’s like everything that’s awesome about Kansas City’s food scene (except the BBQ) rolled into a beer.

There was a lot of chatter before the beer’s release (which kept getting pushed back due to some kind of issue surrounding the label) – heavy anticipation, lots of beer geeks bugging each other online and calling into the store I work at wanting to know if the release date was set, that sort of thing. The longer we waited, the more we talked; the more we talked, the more excited we became.

When the Chocolate Ale finally appeared, the people that had been talking went out and bought it. Quickly. Thanks to the power of twitter and FSM knows what else, most liquor stores in the metro area sold out within hours of receiving their Tuesday-ish shipments.

The sellout happened when the only people aware of the new beer were the city beer geeks, who had been excitedly discussing this stuff for months.

But then it got worse. On the post-release, post-sellout Friday after the Tuesday beer buy-a-thon, the Kansas City Star (our local paper) stoked the fire by running a front page story about Boulevard Chocolate Ale, thus alerting the entire non-beer-snob populace to the existence of this grand and glorious collaboration of brewery and chocolatier.** Sensing something fabulous, the citizens of my fair metropolis reacted to this beer like 13 year old fangirls presented with the prospect of a concert featuring a triple header of Justin Bieber, the Jonas Brothers and Hannah Montana.

Unfortunately, the story was too much, too late. I think it mostly served to piss people off by letting them know that there had recently been awesome beer to be had, and that they had missed it. Furor ensued, filled with indignant complaints from people who hadn’t managed to find any Chocolate Ale. It went a little overboard.***

Boulevard, caught WAY off guard, spent a few days figuring out what to do (I cannot imagine what working there must have been over the past week and a half), and ended by posting an apologetic (if taken aback) letter on its website, promising to make another batch next year. I think they’ve been pretty much 100% fantastic about all of this, given the insanity they’ve had to deal with.

At this point (9 days post-release), Chocolate Ale is going for $50 on craigslist and apparently higher on ebay, and twitter is alight with twits telling one where one can find a pint of the elixir.

I found some tonight. Here we are together:

Here’s my review, if you’d like to read it.
________________________________________________________
*Christopher Elbow chocolates look like this:

and contain everything from banana to passionfruit to rosemary to balsamic. THEY ROCK AND YOU SHOULD TRY SOME.

**To be honest, I think the Chocolate Ale got more news coverage in the paper that day than did everything going on in Egypt, but this may be faulty memory on my part. I forgot the rest of the news of the day the instant I saw the article because I was so horrified startled to see it in print days after the beer was already gone.
***Some people 13-year-old fangirls have zero sense of scale. I mean, it’s sad not to get some really cool beer, but it’s fundamentally just beer. It isn’t the last supply of oxygen left on the planet, so calm down. Please.

Read Full Post »

Welcome, everyone! This is the first post of my lovely new blog. I’ve imported everything from my old beer and wine blogs here so that you can surf the posts at your leisure without the trouble of blog-hopping and so my brilliance can be amassed in one spot.

This post is a review of the bestest of all best Rieslings I’ve ever had, dedicated to the lovely Dr. B for her naming brilliance: new blog’s name comes courtesy of Dr. B’s brainworkings.

Wine: Frisk Riesling
Vintage: 2010
Region: Victoria, Australia
Grapes involved: Riesling
Color: fairly clear with light golden hints
Cost: $11.99
Food pairings: It could do spicy, sweet, savory, cheesy, beefy, chocolatey or nothing at all. Who needs food when one has wine like this?

This wine is my current favorite wine on the planet. It’s the first wine I’ve ever believed I could consume in case-sized amounts. It’s light and sparkling and slightly acidic and slightly sweet-but-still-dry-ish and, like Walt Whitman, contains multitudes.

The scent is a wild combination of powdered sugar, jasmine, and all kinds of citrus-y things with bits of guava and tropical fruits of that ilk thrown in. It’s glorious and wonderful.* And I do mean powdered sugar (icing sugar for the Canadians out there): I never really noticed that powdered sugar has its own smell until I smelled this wine and had powdered sugar come to mind specifically.

Flavor-wise, it’s peach and jasmine and pear predominantly, with bits of tangerine, guava, passionfruit, grass, and something that hand-on-heart I think might be bubblegum. It’s maybe, maybe off-dry, slightly sweet in a manner that isn’t cloying and isn’t dessert-like. It has a really nice, bright acidity to it, which helps pick up the citrus-y fruity notes.

Bonus: it sparkles.

Like, it’s not a bubbly wine: this is not Champagne’s next  knock-off. The label calls it a “Prickly” Riesling, which I think works. There’s enough CO2 to make tiny little bubbles all over the glass, some of which float up through the wine and play on the tongue and all that sort of fun stuff, but that’s it.

I really do honestly think this wine is just about perfect. It’s my current standard for all other Rieslings – they have a lot to live up to now.

Please note: my photography skills are still  lacking. One day, this will be a much better, clearer picture with an honest-to-goodness readable label and everything.
____________________________________________________________
*I would beg and plead for a perfume that smells like this, but my skin kills jasmine and sugar faster than you can say “caramel factory on fire” (which is about what that would smell like on me). So I’m going to hope that some wonderful person comes up with a way to turn the scent into a candle.

Read Full Post »

In which two of the bestest of all best things of Kansas City collaborate: Boulevard and Christopher Elbow (whose chocolates YOU NEED TO HAVE IN YOUR LIFE)(because you know what a chocolate truffle needs? Earl Grey Tea, that’s what. Seriously. So amazing.) made an ale together. Yes, an ale. Not a stout, an ale. Like a roughly amber-colored ale. With hops (and chocolate) and everything.

It comes out on Tuesday. I got to try it already because my job is awesome like that.

Basic Info:
Name:
Chocolate Ale
Origin: Boulevard Brewing Co., Kansas City, MO
Style: Chocolate Ale
ABV: 9.1%
IBU: 24
I drank this: as a sample at work, taking copious notes

See, when I heard Boulevard was making some kind of limited edition chocolate “thing” for the Smokestack series, I assumed what anyone else would: the “thing” in question would either be a stout or a porter (because, being that both styles often use chocolate malts, chocolate is a good, if obvious, addition).

No one ever mentioned that Christopher Elbow would be involved. I seriously cannot describe his chocolate beyond saying a) it is amazingly amazing, b) the flavors are unbelievable, and c) IS PRITTY. So here’s his website to describe it for me. Anyway, had I known Christopher Elbow was involved I would have known there was no way in hell they’d bother making a stout, because that would have been too easy.

Anyway, having tried it, I suspect everyone involved had a whee of a good time.

So here’s the beer. It’s a gorgeous amber color with a thick, tan head and a scent of rich, *slightly* bitter milk chocolate. There might be a touch of fruit in the back.

Upon first taste, I noticed the mouthfeel before I noticed the chocolate (which is a good trick given the chocolate was what I was looking for) – it’s silk. Or cream. It’s smooth and rich and soft and luxurious and wonderful. And yet, as silky as it is, there’s a bite to it from the hops.

Flavor-wise, the chocolate is easily the dominant flavor. On first taste, I really thought milk chocolate; later, I was leaning more towards semi-sweet. It’s probably bittersweet or cocoa nibs or something like that which has then been sweetened by the high alcohol content to read more sweetly. The malts – and the chocolate, I suspect - has a definite sort of fruitiness to it, which I took to be almost cherry-like at first sip. The hops, while bitey, aren’t particularly bitter – just enough to keep the ale from being too sugary.

To be honest, my first reaction was “chocolate-covered maraschino cherry with hops,” but I revised that on the second taste. The second round through, I can still taste the chocolate and the hint of fruit and the bite of the hops, but it’s so much more complex than my first reaction. It’s really pretty awesome. I also think it’s the type of beer that would cellar BEAUTIFULLY – a year or so would really round out the hop bite and let it all meld into a happy chocolate beer heaven.* That said, it’s already kickass, so enjoy whenever you want it.

So basically, try to find some, especially if you love Kansas City, because it’s a project of some of the greatest epicureans we have in this city. I think it’s going to FLY off the shelves at light speed, so this is one of those “swing by your liquor store during lunch at work on Tuesday to get it” type beers, because I’m not convinced it’s going to be around much longer than that. And enjoy it, because it’s a master creation of some amazing artisans and deserves to get some love.

______________________________________________________________
*If I am the luckiest bastard ever to live, there will in fact be a chocolate beer heaven, and I will get to go there.

Read Full Post »

For tonight’s post-tsnownami snowmageddon snowpocalypse -blizzard update,* I thought I’d pull one of the fun beers out of the fridge, happy that 1) it isn’t still snowing, 2) my car seems so far in good working order, and 3) we still have functional heat and electricity. Given the low tonight is in the -10 area of the Fahrenheit scale, that last one deserves particular celebration.

Here is the chosen beer, in its gloriousness:

Basic Info:
Name:
30th Anniversary – Grand Cru (which I keep mistyping as cry). There were actually four 30th Anniversary beers released from what I can tell, so if we go by wine standards, the Grand Cru label means I managed to snag the best of the bunch.
Origin: Sierra Nevada, Chico, CA
Style: American Strong Ale
ABV: 9.2%
IBU: couldn’t find it, but it was WAY up there.
I drank this: at home, with a cat in the background. The cat, who was refusing to play along and look at me, is Jamie.

The 30th Anniversary Grand Cru I have seriously typed cry every time is a blend of Oak-Aged Bigfoot (Sierra Nevada’s Barleywine), Celebration Ale (the Winter Seasonal Fresh Hop IPA), and “fresh” Pale Ale (i.e., the Sierra Nevada with the bright green label that y’all had better already know by now). They took this lovely mishmash, dry hopped the bejeezus out of it, and then bottled it. The result (once we managed to get the cork out of the bottle, which was a lengthy feat involving gnashing of teeth, twisting of bottle, breakage of cork and eventual deployment of corkscrew) looks like this:

You can see the wire cork cage peeking out behind the glass if you can avert your eyes from the pretty copper color of the beer. Corked beer bottles: when you care enough to snazz it up like wine.

Anyway, the actual beer is flipping fantastic and easily one of the top 10 I’ve had in years. It starts with the awesomesauce fresh, resinous hop scent of the Celebration Ale, with a touch of caramelly-sweet malts in the back. The head that you can see on the beer is lovely – thick, creamy, and around for the whole glass.

Flavor-wise, it was roughly what I was expecting when I saw the combination of beers they listed. It’s primarily a hophead’s dream beer, yet it also has a strong malty backbone. To start with the malts (before I go into hophead spasm): the malts are primarily caramelly and sweet and toasty, held up by oak-aging (read: more toast) and the high alcohol volume – the combination works to create what is easily the smoothest, creamiest mouthfeel I’ve ever experienced in a beer this hoppy. This is one of those beers that is the mouthfeel equivalent of drinking heavy cream: I wouldn’t want it in July, but if it’s going to be minus supercold degrees out tonight, I’m all over it.

While I tend to go more strongly for the bright, clear, citrus-style hops most of the time, this beer isn’t in that kind of mood – it’s a resin-bomb. It’s the sort of resin that screams “wet hop” – rich and piney and bitter, almost mouth-coating. And STRONG.  *insert happy gurgle noise here*

Honestly, what happened, and why I’m so unabashedly in love with this beer over so many others that I’ve had, is that it confused the hell out of my tastebuds. What I mean by this is that if there’s any truth to the idea that tastebuds are “mapped” to emphasize certain tastes in certain areas (i.e., the tip of the tongue tastes sweet, the back bitter, the sides sour and salty), this beer redrew that map. I could map out specific areas of my tongue that were tasting specific sorts of flavors, but it wasn’t the normal map: the alcohol/caramel sweetness came on the sides of my tongue, the dry toast flavor at the back, the hoppy bitterness more at the tip. So, like, everything was backwards. It’s *fascinating* (<—– with jazzhands).

The closest comparison I can come up with for those of you in the 30th Anniversary-deprived sectors of life is a Stone Double Bastard, but with a heavy cream mouthfeel. This was excellent, and I’m glad I got to enjoy it.

Keep up the awesome brewing, Sierra Nevada!

_____________________________________________

*It appalls me that “tsnownami” and “snowmageddon” were both accepted without question by the spellchecker on this program. I thought I’d made up that particular spelling of tsnownami just then (my brilliant addition being the t at the beginning of the word – I hadn’t seen that yet). Poo.
Oddly, despite the program’s acceptance of the words I just mentioned, even this program won’t accept the word “snowpocalypse.” I think it must be over it too. So seriously, by next winter we really need some new bad snow puns to work with.

Read Full Post »

We’ll consider this post as a two-fer on recommendations/requests – the Chateau Ste Michelle rec from Steph (do you have any favorite reds from them I should check out?), and the Riesling request from Dr. B (who might be happy to know that there are a few more Riesling reviews coming soon).

Also good to note is that I think I’m beginning a major love affair with Riesling. I hadn’t had too too many before I started this whole project under the mistaken impression that they were superduper sweet. Turns out that this isn’t the case. We’ll leave superduper sweet to the world of Muscato. Riesling has this lovely brightness to it that Muscato seems not to – Muscato seems to go more the way of near-dessert/ice wine sweetness.

Wine: Chateau Saint Michelle Riesling
Vintage: 2009
Region: Columbia Valley, WA
Grapes involved: Riesling
Color: fairly clear with light golden hints
Cost: $11.99
Food pairings: Seriously, I could see all kinds of things working here – Riesling seems like a really good wine for pairing. Specifically, I’d hit Thai, Indian, or some other spicy Asian food in a heartbeat, or any variety of soft cheese/bread/fruit, some kind of fruit dessert, chocolate, Nutella, anything you could dream of with chicken or tofu or whatever.

Sorry for the tinytiny pic, everyone! The label is pretty standard – name of the winery, name of the wine, pic of the estate. Functional.

Onwards to the wine itself then, shall we?

The nose on this is amazing – one of those “must have perfume of this” wines. My notes include pear, lemon, a possible hint of peach (which I then crossed out and changed to nectarine), orange blossom and a touch of sugarcane (not sweet so much as, well, it said sugarcane at me – like unprocessed form).

Flavor-wise, it’s pear, nectarine, melon, a touch of honey, some acidic, citrus-y brightness and peach. It has wonderfully bright acidity with a medium (I’m guessing) body and a shorter finish.

Notes from the label: The label mentions ripe peach, juicy pear, and racy acidity in the tasting notes. It also mentions that they use a long, cool fermentation to preserve the fruitiness and crispness of the wine.

Would I order again? Definitely yes, especially if Frisk Riesling isn’t available. Good stuff. I’m dying to pair it with some kind of Thai curry.
For that matter, this would be a good wine to enjoy even without food.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: